Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24591 (KAR)

SMT MANASA M v. SMT. SEETHAMMA K S

CRL.RP/641/2024 · 2026-06-22

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30827 CRL.RP No. 641 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 641 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT MANASA M W/O SRI SARAVANAN.S AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT DHANALAKSHMI, 14, NAL, WIND TUNNEL ROAD, GOLF VIEW LAYOUT BANGALORE – 560 017. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESHA GOWDA,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SEETHAMMA K S W/O SRI D KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT NO 31,GAYATRI HOUSE BUILDING LAYOUT, 11TH CROSS, BASAVESHWARANAGARA, BANGALORE – 560 079. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. GANESHA R,ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.C.NO.21382/2016, ON THE FILE OF XX ADDL. CMM AT BENGALURU AND IN CRL.A.NO.1781/2019, ON THE Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30827 CRL.RP No. 641 of 2024 FILE OF THE LXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-65) VIDE JUDGMENT DATED 16.04.2021 AND THEREBY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S SEC. 138 OF N.I. ACT, FOR THE REASONS STATED ABOVE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner is present. This Court vide order dated 20.08.2024 suspended the sentence subject to the revision petitioner depositing 50% of the fine amount (inclusive of the fine amount, if any already deposited) before the trial Court within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that no such compliance is made and the learned counsel for the revision petitioner endorsed the submission made by learned counsel for respondent. The matter was referred to mediation centre and the revision petitioner never appeared before the mediation for the period of 60 days and the matter was not settled. Hence, in view of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30827 CRL.RP No. 641 of 2024 non-compliance of the conditional order for a period of nearly two years and also not pursuing the matter and also not yet admitted. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2