Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24575 (PNJ)

JAGRAJ SINGH @ GAJI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/33459/2026 · 2026-06-22

Aaradhna Sawhney

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33459-2026 Date of Decision:22.06.2026 Jagraj Singh @ Gaji ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Mr. Arshdeep Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Thapar, Sr. DAG, Punjab. *** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (ORAL) Written request for adjournment has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the petitioner appears and submits that since the petitioner has been arrested, the petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) 22.06.2026 JUDGE Parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.06.22 17:23 I agree to specified portions of this document