ISUKUPALLI RAVI KUMAR VARMA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/10008/2025 · 2026-03-11
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24572 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24572 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010510372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10008/2025 Between:
1.ISUKUPALLI RAVI KUMAR VARMA, S/O VENKATA RAMANAYYA RAJU, AGE 35 YRS, C/KSHATRIYA, D.NO.65-10-LA FLAT NO.F-4, SRI NILAYAM APARTMENT, MANTRIPRAGADAVARI STREET, NARASANNA NAGAR, KAKINADA, PH.98499 78229 AADHAR NO.7959 7392 2554 (A-1) 2.ISUKAPALLI RADHA KUMARI,, W/O VENKATA RAMANAYYA RAJU (A- 2) AGE 55 YRS, C/KSHATRIYA, D.NO.65-10-LA, FLAT NO.F-4 SRI NILAYAM APARTMENT, MANTRIPRAGADAVARI STREET NARASANNA NAGAR, KAKINADA, PH.97014 27347 AADHAR NO.9866 0507 4007 3.ISUKAPALLI VENKATA RAMANAYYA RAJU, S/O LATE SURAPPA RAJU, AGE 62 YRS, C/KSHATRIYA, D.NO.65-10-LA, FLAT NO. F-4, SRI NILAYAM APARTMENT, MANTRIPRAGADAVARI STREET NARASANNA NAGAR, KAKINADA PH.97045 66135 AADHAR NO.2325 5534 3985 (A-3) 4.ISUKAPALLI VENKATA RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O RAMANAYYA RAJU BROTHER-IN-LAW, BUSINESS, AGED 37 YEARS, KSHATRIYA DOOR NO.65-10-LA, SRI NILAYAM APARTMENT OPP. VICTORY BAZAR, NARASANNA NAGAR KAKINADA-533 003 (A-4) 5.SMT. ISUKAPALLI DURGA DEVI, W/O RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU CO- DAUGHTER-IN-LAW, HOUSEWIFE, AGED 35 YEARS KSHATRIYA, DOOR NO.65-10-LA, SRI NILAYAM APARTMENT OPP. VICTORY BAZAR, NARASANNA NAGAR KAKINADA-533 003 (A-5) ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
2 AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BLDGS AMARAVATI 2.SMT ISUKAPALLI GOWRI NIHARIKA, W/O RAVI KUMAR VARMA, AGED 27 YEARS, C/KSHATRIYA, R/O D.NO.22-3-5 DEEPLAVARI STREET, SALIPETA, KAKINADA URBAN ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the Petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 12.03.2026 VTS