Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24571 (AP)

PRAGADA SIVA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/7626/2022 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010509362022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7626/2022 Between: 1. PRAGADA SIVA RAO, S/O LATE VENKATARAMANA, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 7-42-237, SANGIVALASA COLONY, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKAPATNAM DST. 2. PRAGADA ANURADHA @ RADHA,, W/O SIVA RAO, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 7-42-237, SANQIVALASA COLONY, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKAPATNAM DST. 3. SUNKARA PAVITHRA,, W/O CHANDRASHEKARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO.20-211/5/2/8, SF-1, DEVI NIVAS, SURYANAGAR, KOTHAPALERN, GOPALAPATNAM RURAL, VISAKAPATNAM. 4. MAMIDI VENKATA RATNAM@ RATNA,, W/O GANAPTHI RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O RAILWAY QUARTER NO.664/12, MSM COLONY, OPP.SLLOSEPH, GNANAPURAM, VISAKAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY IS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P. 2. DR THALLAPUDI ARCHANA, W/O PRAGADA VENKATESH, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O BOTSAOPETA, THOTAPALEM, VIZIANAGARAM ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of 2 Criminal Petition, the High CourtIt is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the prooceedings in C.C.No.1481 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate ( Special Mobile ), Vizianagaram, against the Petitioners/A1 to A5, and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased For the reasons stated in the accompanying quash petition grounds filed in support of the above criminal petition, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.1481 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate ( Special Mobile ), Vizianagaram, to the extent of the Petitioners/A2 to A5, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7626/2022 ORDER: None represented on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Mrs. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance. 3. As can be seen from the information received from the Registry, the matter before the Trial Court is settled before Lok-adalat. Hence, no further orders are required in this petition. 4. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS