IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16621/2026 Decided on: 24.09.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chander Parkash Verma …..Petitioner Versus HRTC & Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, learned counsel, ap- pears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 14.06.2026 (Annexures P-4), seeking applicability of Sunita San- groli Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2. has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid rep- resentation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 5043/2022 decided on 08.08.2023 2 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consid- er and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in ac- cordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 24th September, 2026 rohit