Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24567 (CAL)

UTPAL SEN v. RANDHIR KUMAR, THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION AND ANR.

CPAN/347/2026 · 2026-06-22

Bivas Pattanayak

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.06.2026 Item No.16(DL) Ct. No.14 srm IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CPAN 347 of 2026 In WPA No. 16665 of 2025 Utpal Sen Versus Mr. Randhir Kumar & Ors. Mr. Sudipta Maity … for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Visya, Mr. Nilay Baran Mandal … for the Alleged Contemnor No.1. Mr. Brijendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Asit Kumar De …for the State-respondents. 1. Mr. Sudipta Maity, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner/applicant submits that order of this Court has been duly complied with and Pension Payment Order has been issued in favour of the petitioner- Applicant. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, learned Advocate for the alleged contemnor files a copy of the Pension Payment Order, which is taken on record. 3. In view of such submission, contempt application being CPAN 347 of 2026 stands disposed of. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)