Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24563 (AP)

Battula Bala Rama Krishna v. Ms. V. Siri Anand

CC/2591/2018 · 2026-03-11

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010510032018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2591/2018 Between: 1. BATTULA BALA RAMA KRISHNA, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. 78-4-4/5, GANDHIPURAM - 2 RAJAHMUNDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MS V SIRI ANAND, D/o. Not known, Aged Not known, The Regional Transport Authority, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent authority for willfully and deliberately not complying with the orders of this Honble court dated 02.05.2018 passed in WP No. 16033 of 2018 U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the representation delay of 63 days in filing the Contempt Case in WP.No.16033 of 2018 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UDAYA BHASKARA RAO PECHETTI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. K NARSI REDDY The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 2591 of 2018 ORDER: Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the contempt case. Therefore, the Contempt Case is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 12.03.2026 KAS 3 119 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 2591 of 2018 Date: 12.03.2026 KAS