106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.34296 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-22.06.2026 Brijesh Kumar …..Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Ravi Kadian, Advocate (through video-conference) for Mr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Madhur Jangra, Advocate for the complainant. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.(Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that certain errors have crept in as a result of which, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action with better particulars. 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) June 22, 2026 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.06.22 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.