Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24556 (AP)

SWATHI CONSTRUCTIONS v. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR

CC/4575/2024 · 2026-01-01

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010505352024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4575/2024 Between: 1. SWATHI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS THE MANAGING PARTNER, VEMI REDDY REDDAIAH, S/O. VEERA REDDY, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.203, VENKATADRI RESIDENCY, YERRAMUKKAPALLI VILLAGE, KADAPA MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. SRI BUDITHI RAJASEKHAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL AND CO OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI. 4. SRI S DILLI RAO, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SRI NAGARAJU, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. V RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING 2 ENGINEER, PANCHAYATI RAJ CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. E MADANNA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATH RAJ PRI DIVISION KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. SRI M VIJAYA SUNEETHA, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, GUNTUR,GUNTUR DISTRICT 9. SRI BALU NAIK, THE CHIEF ENGINEER,PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE,VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. RR 8 AND 9 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 26/09/25,VIDE IA.NO1/2025 IN CC NO-4575 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take to cognizance the offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents herein and to punish them for violating the orders dated 03.07.2024 passed in W.P No. 29253 of 2023 by Honble Sri JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed respondents as Respondents Nos. 8 & 9 in C.C.No. 4575 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3. OMKAR D 4. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK 3 The Court made the following Order: The respondent counsel submits the written instructions from the 7th respondent dated 02.01.2026 and submits that, the order under contempt has already been complied with. The said instructions shall be made as part of the court record. The learned counsel for the petitioner also confirms the submission made by the respondent counsel. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in this contempt case and accordingly, it is closed. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 02.01.2026 NNN