Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24543 (AP)

Parsotam Patel v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/31110/2013 · 2026-03-02

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010495962013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 31110/2013 Between: 1. PARSOTAM PATEL, S/O LATE VATSARAM PATEL, HINDU, AGED 56 YEARS, SRI VENKATESWARA TIMBER DEPOT, # 58-1-236, NAD KOTHA ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION) SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPTD. BY ITS ZONAL COMMISISONE, ZONE IV, GNANAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SMT VANKAYALA SARALA, D/O. SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O. FLAT NO.15, SRIDEVI PARADISE, VOOTAGADDA, DASPALLA HILLS, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C SINDHU KUMARI 2. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC) 3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri V.V.N. Narayana Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that no further consideration is necessary in this Writ Petition. 2. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:03.03.2026 Vns