K.BHASKAR, GUNTUR DIST. v. H Y DORA, CHITTOOR DIST. & ANOTHER
CC/1636/2017 · 2026-02-11
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24540 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24540 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010506892017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1636/2017 Between:
1. K.BHASKAR, GUNTUR DIST., S/O.POLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER (OPERATIONS), ONGOLE PRAKASAM DISTRICT, APSPDCL, R/O.DOOR NO.4-5-5/4, 3RD LANE, NAVA BHARAT NAGAR, (RING ROAD), GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. H Y DORA CHITTOOR DIST ANOTHER, S/O. KNOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, APSPDCL, CORPORATE OFFICE, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2. D YESUNADHU, S/O. KNOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER/HRD/SPDCL, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971, for ifiliVittiU1 and deliberate violation of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.MP.No.22990 of 2017 in WP.No.18857 of 2017, dated 12.6.2017 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA (SC FORAPSPDCL)
2
The court made the following ORDER:
The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful and deliberate violation of the interim orders dated 12.06.2017, passed in W.P.M.P.No.22990 of 2017 in W.P.No.18857 of 2017.
2. In view of the closure of the main writ petition, Ms. Ester Rani, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue the present contempt case.
3. Recording the submission made, the contempt case is closed.
4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 12.02.2026 GVK
3
118
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
CONTEMPT CASE No.1636 of 2017
Date: 12.02.2026
GVK