IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45371 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-394 Year-2025 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Rajgir Ram S/O Babulal Ram R/O- village-Gokhulpur, P.S-Bidupur, District-vaishali 2. Mahendra Ram S/O Shivnandan Ram R/O- village-Gokhulpur, P.S-Bidupur, District-vaishali 3. Ramchandra Ram S/O Sonu Ram @ Sanu Ram R/O- village-Gokhulpur, P.S-Bidupur, District-vaishali 4. Ashok Ram S/O Nand Ram @Ramnandan Ram R/O- village-Gokhulpur, P.S-Bidupur, District-vaishali 5. Sanoj Ram S/O Jitan Ram @ Yogendra Ram R/O- village-Gokhulpur, P.S- Bidupur, District-vaishali 6. Rajendra Ram S/O Jitan Ram R/O- village-Gokhulpur, P.S-Bidupur, District- vaishali 7. Sujeet Ram S/O Jitan Ram R/O Vill - Gokhulpur, P.S. - Bidupur,District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad- A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 14-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45371 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026 2/3 informant alleges that his brother (Rajesh) was married to Sangita about five years back and was living at his in-law’s place for the last six months. On 08.06.2025 at 10.00 A.M., he was informed by his relative that his brother was murdered and his dead body was thrown in river Ganga. Accordingly, he reached the place of occurrence and along with villagers, the dead body was searched and recovered. Accordingly, he was informed and the dead body was sent for post mortem and thereafter the dead body was cremated. It is next alleged that he came to know that petitioners killed his brother on account of existing dispute. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant based on suspicion and is not an eye witness to the occurrence. It is further submitted that petitioner no.1 is aged about 77 years, petitioner no.2 is aged about 73 years and petitioner no.3 is aged about 81 years. It is next submitted that petitioner no.6 is father in-law of the deceased and petitioner no.7 is cousin brother of petitioner no.6 and rest of the petitioners are co-villagers of petitioner no.6. It is next submitted that in the post mortem report, the cause of death was recorded as fresh water drowning which amply demonstrates Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45371 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026 3/3 that deceased died on account of drowning and the informant for reason best known instituted the instant false case. It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove their innocence. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bidupur P. S. Case No.394 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 7. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T