Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24534 (JHR)

RAJU ORAON @ R. ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7972/2026 · 2026-08-27

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25754 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7972 of 2026 Raju Oraon @ R. Oraon, aged about 46 years, S/o Shalu Oraon, R/o Udrangi, P.O. Bhandra, P.S. Bhandra, Distrct Lohardaga … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Advocate --- 02/27th August 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Lohardaga Mahila P.S. Case No. 37/2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 131/2025 (S.T. No. 46/2025) for the offence registered under Sections 64(1), 351(3) and 127(2) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge I-cum-Spl. Judge, Lohardaga. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier in B.A. No. 5101/2025 vide order dated 18.08.2025, against which the petitioner has moved the Hon’ble Supreme Court and liberty was granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the victim is recorded and it was directed that the bail application be considered on its own merits. The learned counsel submits that the victim has been examined and she has turned hostile. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the victim has already been examined and has turned hostile, the 2026:JHHC:25754 2 petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge I-cum- Spl. Judge, Lohardaga in connection with Lohardaga Mahila P.S. Case No. 37/2024, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 27.08.2026 Uploaded On: 29.08.2026 Mukul/-