APHC010504382024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26422/2024 Between: 1. VEMULA SUBBA RAO, S/O. V. PEDDA KOTAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. 3-35, ANAKARLAPUDI VILLAGE, KONDEPI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. VEMULA LAKSHMAIAH, S/O. V. PEDDA KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. 3-30, ANAKARLAPUDI VILLAGE, KONDEPI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SMT. VEMULA ANURADHA, W/O. VEMULA LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. 3-30, ANAKARLAPUDI VILLAGE, KONDEPI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KONDEPI POLICE STATION, KONDEPI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SMT BEZAWADA RAJESWARI, W/O. LATE. B.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. JAMMULAPALEM VILLAGE, TANGUTUR MANDAL,PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. SMT KATRAGADDA CHENNAMMA, W/O. VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC HOUSWIFE, R/O. CHALAMAKURU VILLAGE, MARRIPUDI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the the action of the Respondent No. 3 and his staff are interfering in land Dispute/Civil Dipsute between the petitioners and Respondent Nos.4 and 5 and their henchmen in connection with the agricultural land situated in Sy.No.210/2B to an extent of Ac. 1.73 Cents out of Ac. 1.92 cents of Anakarlapudi Village. Kondepi Mandal, Prakasam District illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and his staff not to interfere in land Dispute/Civil Dipsute between the petitioners and Respondent Nos.4 and 5 and his henchmen in connection with the agricultural land situated in Sy.No.210/2B to an extent of Ac. 1.73 Cents out of Ac. 1.92 cents of Anakarlapudi Village, Kondepi Mandal, Prakasam District forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 and his staff not to interfere in land Dispute/Civil Dipsute between the petitioners and Respondent Nos.4 and 5 and his henchmen in connection with the agricultural land situated in Sy.No.210/2B to an extent of Ac. 1.73 Cents out of Ac.1.92 cents of Anakarlapudi Village, Kondepi Mandal, Prakasam District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MAHESWARI ARIKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26422/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the the action of the Respondent No. 3 and his staff are interfering in land Dispute/Civil Dispute between the petitioners and Respondent Nos.4 and 5 and their henchmen in connection with the agricultural land situated in Sy.No.210/2B to an extent of Ac. 1.73 Cents out of Ac. 1.92 cents of Anakarlapudi Village. Kondepi Mandal, Prakasam District illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and his staff not to interfere in land Dispute/Civil Dipsute between the petitioners and Respondent Nos.4 and 5 and his henchmen in connection with the agricultural land situated in Sy.No.210/2B to an extent of Ac. 1.73 Cents out of Ac. 1.92 cents of Anakarlapudi Village, Kondepi Mandal, Prakasam District forthwith and to pass…” 2. Heard Ms.Maheswari Arika, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that it is a case of interference of police in the civil disputes. 4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that based on the contents of the complaint made by the 4th respondent, the police registered a case in Crime No.123 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Section 329(3), 324(4), 79, 351(2) r/w 3 (5) BNS against the petitioners herein. Therefore, police are calling the petitioners only for enquiry purpose in the above said case. Except for the purpose of the said case, the police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 4. Considering the submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26422/2024 Dated. 02.01.2026 KKV 244 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 26422/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV