APHC010490692023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25462 of 2023 Between: 1. BADVELI ARAVINDKUMAR REDDY, S/O. BHASKARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/ O. PEDACHERUKURU, NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NELLORE RURAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLEINSPECTOR, MUTHUKURU POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.P.GUDURU POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. VOBBAREDDY SUMIJA, D/O. SURESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE, THOTAPALLI GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. VOBBAREDDY SURESH REDDY, S/O. LATE SRINIVASULU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. VARIGONDA VILLAGE, 2 THOTAPALLI GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 4th and 5th respondent in pressuring the petitioner to settle the disputes with the 6th respondent by paying the amounts to her as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents 4 to 5 not to interfere in the family disputes between the Petitioner and also direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to call the petitioner and his family members to the police station. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P SRIDHAR REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25462 of 2023 ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 4th and 5th respondent in pressuring the petitioner to settle the disputes with the 6th respondent by paying the amounts to her as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents 4 to 5 not to interfere in the family disputes between the Petitioner and also direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to call the petitioner and his family members to the police station.= 2. Heard Sri C. Subodh, learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the 4th and 5th respondent police are interfering in the civil dispute and pressurizing the petitioner to pay the amounts and settle the matter with the 6th respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, for respondents, on instructions, would submit that police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties and the police never threatened the petitioner to settle the dispute by paying the amounts to the 6th respondent. He further submits that there are matrimonial disputes between both the petitioner and un-official respondent. 4 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute, except under due process of law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.01.2026 ARB/JAK 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 317 WRIT PETITION NO: 25462 of 2023 Date: 06.01.2026 ARB/JAK