Makireddy Venkat Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/23815/2018 · 2026-02-23
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24525 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24525 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010506602018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23815/2018 Between:
1. MAKIREDDY VENKAT REDDY,, S/O.SAMBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC. EX-SERVICEMAN, R/O.PEDAKAKANI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, A.P.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR DIVISION, GUNTUR, A.P.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, GUNTUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 4 in assigning land to the petitioner, under the provisions of BSO-15 and in terms of the report of the 3rd respondent in Rc.No.3509/2015-A, dt.22.07.2015 and the report of the 4th respondent in Rc.No.203/2015, dt.20.06.2015, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently
2
direct the respondents 2 to 4 to effect assignment of land, as identified in the said reports, to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take further steps in the matter of assignment of land to the petitioner, in terms of the report of the 3rd respondent in Rc.No.3509/2015-A, dt.22.07.2015 and the report of the 4th respondent in Rc.No.203/2015, dt.20.06.2015 and to grant to the petitioner, land under the Ex-servicemen quota under BSO-15, pending disposal of writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave to the 2nd Respondent in W.P. No. 23815 of 2018, to file counter affidavit in the above W P and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have filed a Memo on 13.02.2026 seeking withdrawal of the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 24.02.2026 KAS
4
141
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 23815/2018
Dated: 24.02.2026 KAS