Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24518 (AP)

M.Bara Imam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/31059/2017 · 2026-01-07

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010505842017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31059/2017 Between: M.bara Imam, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31059 of 2017 Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to direct the Respondents to pay salary to the Petitioner from 01-01-2005 till the date of retirement i.e. 31-032010 as Junior Lecturer in Civics on par with other Junior Lecturers under the principle 'equal pay for equal work' by declaring the action of the Respondents in not paying the salary of the Petitioner though extracting work from the Petitioner as Junior Lecturer is illegal and contrary to law and violative of Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and also contrary to the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in SCC 2017 (1) Page No.148 in the matter of State of Punjab Vs. Jagjith Singh by issuing Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or Order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last occasion i.e. on 31.12.2025. On 31.12.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 3. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. 3 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 08.01.2026. ASR 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.31059 of 2017 08.01.2026 ASR