Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24513 (JHR)

PAWAN GOPE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8009/2026 · 2026-08-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:25846 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8009 of 2026 ------ Pawan Gope, aged about 32 years, son of Krishna Gope, Resident of village –Mandru Toli, Chikor, P.O. & P.S. – Khunti, District –Khunti, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27.08.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Karra P.S. Case No.87 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 308(3), 324, 324(5), 326(f), 111(2)(b), 61(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 17 of the CLA Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being member of the extremist organization PLFI set fire to the Poclain machine and tried to burn the Hywa Vehicle by throwing fireballs. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been implicated in this case on the basis of his self-confessional statement as well as the confessional statement of the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.11.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 18 of the bail application. It is further submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined so far. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -I, Khunti, in connection with Karra P.S. Case No.87 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 27.08.2026 Sonu/