Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2451 (PNJ)

KULDEEP SINGH @KAKU v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/13378/2026 · 2026-04-20

Sumeet Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 224 CRM-M-13378-2026 KULDEEP SINGH @KAKU .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: 20.04.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING:20.04.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Gopal Rathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ram Bhati, Advocate for Mr. Harpreet Singh Jakhal, Advocate for the complainant. ….. SUMEET GOEL , J (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.04 dated 18.01.2025 under Sections 103, 238, 3(5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Talwandi Bhai, District Ferozepur. Faced with the situation that the FIR complainant, Mahinder Singh, is yet to be examined as a prosecution witness, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition at this stage. The trial Court is directed to expedite the recording of the said prosecution witness, namely Mahinder Singh, the FIR complainant. Ordered accordingly. (SUMEET GOEL) 20.04.2026 JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2026.04.20 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document