- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18969 WP No. 4319 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 4319 OF 2023 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. ABDUL AZEEZ, S/O MR B ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.6053, BADRIYA MANZIL, BOLLLURU, HALEANGADY VILLAGE AND POST, MANGALURU TALUK - 575 146. 2. MRS FOUZIYA, W/O MR ABDUL AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO.8252, BADRIYA MANZIL, BOLLLURU, HALEANGADY VILLAGE AND POST, MANGALURU TALUK - 575 146. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENT BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE. 2. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR AND RECOVERY OFFICER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, MANGALURU, SUB-DIVISION, MANGALURU - 575 001. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18969 WP No. 4319 of 2023 REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. 3. PADU PANAMBURU SAHAKARI VYVASAIKA SANGH VIYAMITHA, HALEANGADY - 574 146. MANGALURU TALUK, REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANGER. 4. MR HAMEED H, S/O MR HISAIN BEARY, ADULT, MEMBERSHIP NO.7063, SAGU, HALEANGADY - 574 146. MANGALURU TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.H.K.KENCHEGOWDA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; RESPONDENT NO.3 - SERVED; NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.4 IS HELD SUFFICIENT, VIDE ORDER DATED 09.10.2025) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE AUCTION NOTICE IN FORM NO-8 AND 9 DATED 10/01/2023 IN C.E.P.NO.120/2020-21 FOR THE AUCTION TO BE HELD ON 27/02/2023 ISSUED BY THE R-2 9ANNEXRUE-A AND B) THE WRIT PETITION IS PETITIONER CONCERN ONLY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The petitioners herein are assailing the auction notice in Form Nos.8 and 9, issued by respondent No.2. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18969 WP No. 4319 of 2023 2. Taking into consideration, the fact that the petitioners have not challenged the original order/award passed by the Competent Authority, the writ petition does not survive for consideration. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KVR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 42