Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24504 (PAT)

Md. Sadaray Alam v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./27235/2026 · 2026-07-13

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27235 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Sadaray Alam S/O Akhtar Hussain Resident of Village- Dubarbona, P.S. Ladaniya, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30305 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Samsad Alam @ Md. Samsad Alam S/O Mustaque Ahmad R/O Vill.- Dubarbona, P.S- Lalmaniya, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The state of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 27235 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Renuka Ratnakar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30305 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 13-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 07/2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21(c), 22(c), 23(c) and 24 of N.D.P.S. Act. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27235 of 2026(3) dt.13-07-2026 2/2 3. The recovery is of 144 bottles of cough syrup. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner namely, Md. Sadaray Alam claims clean antecedent and petitioner namely, Samsad Alam has one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail and they are in custody since 28.01.2026. The petitioners undertake to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the huge recovery, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, these applications stand dismissed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T