2026:JHHC:26015 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8064 of 2026 Dipanshu Ram @ Dipanshu Kumar Rawani, aged about 20 years, son of Raghu Ram, resident of Village-Kharagdiha, P.O.-Kharagdiha, P.S.- Jamua, District-Giridih. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kishore Kunal, Advocate Mr. Harshit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Shubham Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate --- 02/29th August 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2026 in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 149/2026 corresponding to POCSO Case No. 92/2026 for the offence registered under Section 87, 61(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 4/6 of POCSO Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Giridih. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aged 20 years and the victim was aged 17 years 11 months and 20 days on the date of alleged occurrence. The impugned order itself reveals that the petitioner and the victim were having love affair, the victim voluntarily left home and went with the petitioner to Varanashi. When they came to know about the institution of the case, they returned and were caught at Jamua Railway Station. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions, made by the learned counsel for the petitioner based on the impugned order, are not in dispute. 2026:JHHC:26015 2 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge has already been framed and the impugned order reveals that the victim has stated that she was having love affair with the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 149/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.08.2026 Uploaded On: Mukul/-