Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24504 (CAL)

TALAT PARVEEN AND ORS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/393/2022 · 2026-06-23

Chaitali Chatterjee Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23.06.2026 Ct. No. 34 S/L No.3 sg CRR 393 of 2022 In the matter of : Talat Parveen & Ors. Mr. Md Zeeshanddi Ms. A. Khatoon … Petitioner. Mr. Pritom Roy Ms. Ananya Chakraborty …for the State. 1. It is submitted on behalf of the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that pursuant to the instruction given by the petitioner they are not willing to proceed with this revisional application any further. Written instruction given to that effect to the learned advocate for the petitioner placed before the Court, let it be kept with the record. 2. It is further submitted that out of eight petitioners one has expired, to that extent a death certificate is filed, let it be kept with the record. 3. Hence in view of the instruction as above, let the revisional application be dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of the Calcutta High Court. [Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J]