TALAT PARVEEN AND ORS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRR/393/2022 · 2026-06-23
Chaitali Chatterjee Das
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24504 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24504 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
23.06.2026 Ct. No. 34 S/L No.3 sg
CRR 393 of 2022
In the matter of : Talat Parveen & Ors.
Mr. Md Zeeshanddi
Ms. A. Khatoon
… Petitioner.
Mr. Pritom Roy Ms. Ananya Chakraborty
…for the State.
1. It is submitted on behalf of the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that pursuant to the instruction given by the petitioner they are not willing to proceed with this revisional application any further. Written instruction given to that effect to the learned advocate for the petitioner placed before the Court, let it be kept with the record.
2. It is further submitted that out of eight petitioners one has expired, to that extent a death certificate is filed, let it be kept with the record.
3. Hence in view of the instruction as above, let the revisional application be dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of the Calcutta High Court.
[Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J]