Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24493 (AP)

Central Tobacco Research Institute (CTRI) v. A.P.Paper Mills Ltd.

AS/86/2014 · 2026-02-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010497382014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 86/2014 Between: 1. CENTRAL TOBACCO RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CTRI), REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, BHASKAR NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. A P PAPER MILLS LTD, Rep. by its Managign Director, Sri RamNagar, Rajahmundry. ...RESPONDENT aggrieved by the Judgement and decree passed in O.S.No.69 of 2006 on the file of Prl Dist Judge, Rajahmundry IA NO: 1 OF 2013(ASMP 2788 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 122 days in representing appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2013(ASMP 2789 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 60 days in filing appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. C VANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. CH PUSHYAM KIRAN The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 86/2014 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) The appellant/plaintiff filed O.S.No.69 of 2006 before the Court of the District Judge, Rajahmundry for recovery of damages along with interest, which was dismissed on merits vide orders dated 09.01.2013. Being aggrieved by the same, the instant appeal has been filed. 2. On 10.07.2025, the following order was passed: “None appeared on either side. Post after four weeks in the weekly causelist.” 3. Today also there is no representation on either side, even in the revised call. 4. The appeal pertains to the year 2014 and it is listed in the weekly list. 5. The Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 06.02.2026 AG 181 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 86/2014 Dated: 06.02.2026 AG