PRADEEP AGARWAL @ PRADIP AGARWAL v. Y. RAGHUVANSHI, SPDT. OF POLICE, JALPAIGURI DISTRICT AND ORS.
CPAN/8/2026 · 2026-06-22
Aniruddha Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24489 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24489 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. 38 22.6.2026
(Item No. 1)
(AB)
In the High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side Contempt
CPAN 8 of 2026 in WPA 1899 of 2025
Pradeep Agarwal @ Pradip Agarwal Vs. Shri Y. Raghuvanshi Superintendent of Police, Jalpaiguri District, Collectorate Avenue, Jalpaiguri Ors.
Mr. Sourojit Dasgupta
….for the petitioner
Mr. Kunaljit Bhattacharyya, Ld. AGP
Ms. Radhika Agarwal
Mr. Kumar Shantanu (VC)
…. For the alleged contemnors
This is a contempt proceeding arising from an
order dated September 12, 2025. Mr. Sourojit Dasgupta, learned advocate appears for the petitioner. Mr. Kumar Shantanu, learned advocate (VC) with Mr. Kunaljit Bhattacharya, learned AGP appears for the alleged contemnors. The compliance report dated April 8, 2026 issued by the Project Director, AH-48 and Executive Engineer, PWD (Roads) shows that the illegal and unauthorized structure has been dismantled and removed. The compliance report of the jurisdictional Inspector-in-charge, P.S. Dhupguri dated April 9, 2026 also shows that, the illegal structure has been
2 demolished and removed. The said report is also on record. Petitioner submits that, the illegal structures are dismantled but the debris are lying there. This is not within the purview of the contempt jurisdiction of this Court. The record shows that the order of this Court stands complied with. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding being CPAN 8 of 2026 stands dropped and closed. The application being CPAN 8 of 2026 stands
disposed of.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)