IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition(T) No.114 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Chander Sekhar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Having carefully perused compliance affidavit vis-a-vis mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, this court is convinced and satisfied that direction contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands complied with and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file separate petition, if any, qua the surviving grievances. Needless to say, consequential benefits, i.e., seniority and promotion, if any, pursuant to judgment sought to be executed, if not released or done, shall also 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 be done expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from today. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 24, 2026 (sunil)