PINDERROOPI KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7232/2026 · 2026-06-19
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24476 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24476 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124
CRWP-7232-2026
Date of decision: 19.06.2026
PINDERROOPI KAUR AND ANOTHER
......Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.......Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
*****
Present: - None for the petitioners. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior DAG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners namely Pinderroopi Kaur and Rajwinder Singh have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from private respondents No.4 to 6. 2. It is averred in the petition that both the petitioners are major, aged 23 years and 25 years respectively and they have performed marriage against the wishes of their parents. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 12.06.2026 at Gurudwara Dashmesh, Pita Patshahi Dasvi (Regd.), Village Singa Devi, Tehsil Kharar, District Mohali VISHAL SHARMA 2026.06.19 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-7232-2026
-2-
as per Sikh rites and rituals. A copy of Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-4) issued by the aforesaid authority has also been appended. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. 3. It is further averred in the petition that a representation dated 12.06.2026 (Annexure P-6) has also been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Bathinda. 4. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. 5. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior DAG, Punjab has appeared and accepted notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. He submits that he has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. 6. Having heard the counsel for respondent-State, the present petition is being disposed of without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, with a direction to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Bathinda, District Bathinda to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 12.06.2026 (Annexure P-6) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. 7.
7. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- VISHAL SHARMA 2026.06.19 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-7232-2026
-3-
Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Bathinda, District Bathinda for requisite compliance. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUNE 19, 2026
JUDGE Vishal Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable
: Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2026.06.19 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document