Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:27179
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 997 of 2023 1 - Bhuneshwar Mahobiya S/o Late Pushan Lal Mahobiya Aged About 51 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Dhamtari Chowk Gundardehi, Tahsil Gundardehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 2 - Leeladhar S/o Late Shri Parauram Nishad Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Nagar Panchayat- Gundardehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 3 - Omprakash Sen S/o Late Rajaram Sen Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Nagar
Panchayat-
Gundardehi,
District-
Balod,
Chhattisgarh 4 - Motilal Dewangan S/o Late Kapit Dewangan Aged About 48 Years R/o Ward No. 13,
Dhamtari
Chowk
Gundardehi,
District-
Balod,
Chhattisgarh 5 - Devkumar S/o Shri Tiharu Ram Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Nagar Panchayat
Gundardehi,
District-
Balod,
Chhattisgarh 6 - Shiv Kumar Kumbhkar S/o Late Puranik Ram Aged About 53 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Nagar Panchayat- Gundardehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 7 - Rajulal Mahobiya S/o Bhayuram Mahobiya Aged About 49 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Nagar Panchayat- Gundardehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 8 - Sevak Ram Mahipal S/o Late Pyarilal Aged About 52 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Nagar Panchayat- Gundardehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Balod, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh 2
- Tahsildar
Gundardehi
District-
Balod,
Chhattisgarh 3 - Nagar Panchayat Gundardehi Through Chief Municipal Officer, Gundardehi, Balod, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Aman Tamrakar, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, PL. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.07.03 10:08:41 +0530
2 SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 02/07/2026
1. This Writ Petition has been preferred against the order dated 30.12.2022 passed by the Tehsildar, Gunderdehi, District Balod, C.G. whereby a direction to remove the gunti of the petitioner has been issued.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash