GAURAV SHARMA ALIAS SAJJAL S/O SHRI SUNIL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4271/2026 · 2026-04-21
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2447 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2447 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16787] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4271/2026 Gaurav Sharma Alias Sajjal S/o Shri Sunil Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Harihar Bhawan Indra Market, P.S. Makbara, Kota City, (Raj.) (Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 21/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No 20/2026 registered at Police Station Makbara, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 12.02.2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner; that none of the injuries sustained by the injured are dangerous to life; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
[2026:RJ-JP:16787] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4271/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 12.02.2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that none of the injuries sustained by the injured are dangerous to life; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Gaurav Sharma Alias Sajjal S/o Shri Sunil Sharma is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /19