Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24469 (AP)

G. Murugesh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/37544/2014 · 2026-03-02

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.37544_2014 APHC010498972014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 37544/2014 Between: 1. G. MURUGESH,, S/O. GURUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, MAHATHMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, OFFICE OF PROJECT DIRECTOR DWMA, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DWMA, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings of the 2nd Respondent vide Roc. No. D1/3988/2014, dated 04.10.2014 keeping the petitioner out of contractual employment temporarily without contemplating any enquiry is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently by setting aside the impugned proceedings of the 2nd Respondent dated 04.10.2014 direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to work as Technical Assistant on contractual basis 2 HN, J W.P.No.37544_2014 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 46979 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspending operation of the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent vide Roc. No. D1/3988/2014, dated 04.10.2014 by allowing the petitioner to work as Technical Assistant in the 2nd respondent department pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon'ble court, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) 2. 3 HN, J W.P.No.37544_2014 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive any further for adjudication and became infructuous. 2. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:03.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.37544_2014 14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 37544 of 2014 Date: 03.03.2026 NKA