Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24455 (JHR)

KARAN DAS @ KARAN KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7167/2026 · 2026-08-29

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26059 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7167 of 2026 Karan Das @ Karan Kumar Das, aged about 20 years Son of Late Narangi das, Resident of Village Chhatatand, P.O - Budhiyadih & P.S- Giridih,, District-Giridih, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mritunjay Chaudhary, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Ankur Anand, Advocate --- 04/29th August 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Giridih (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 159/2026 for the offence registered under Section 64(1), 64(2)(m) OF bns, now said to have been pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Giridih. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the petitioner and the victim are major. It is alleged that the petitioner established a physical relationship with the victim on the pretext of marriage and that one day, the uncle of the victim saw them together and ultimately the petitioner refused to marry her. Now both the petitioner and victim are ready to get marry with support of their family members. The charge- sheet has already been submitted. 3. Learned counsel for the Informant has submitted that the girl as well as one of the family members of the petitioner is present in the Court and they are ready to get the marriage and therefore, the victim has no objection if the petitioner is enlarged on bail. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission that the victim has no objection for grant of bail and it appears that the petitioner and their family members are all set to get them marry, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2026:JHHC:26059 2 Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Giridih in connection with Giridih (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 159/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The State is directed to take appropriate steps to ensure that a lady constable posted in the concerned police station shall visit the victim from time to time in plain dress, at least once in a month, for a period of two years, to ascertain her well-being. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.08.2026 Uploaded On: 29.08.2026 Mukul/-