APHC010499852022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30736/2022 Between: 1. A. SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O LATE PENCHALA REDDY AGED 54 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO- 21, D NO- 4-21-08, MUTHYALA REDDY NAGAR GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJULAMANDYAM POLICE STATION, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. T MURALI, S/O LATE JAYARAMAYYA, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O DOOR NO- 6-10/1 PILLAPALEM VILLAGE, RENUGUNTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in indulging in settlement of civil dispute in respect of petitioner's property is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and to consequently direct the 3rdrespondent not to interfere with the petitioner's right in any manner over the land admeasuring Ac.4.20 cents in Sy No. 723/2 Surappakasam, Renugunta Mandal, Tirupathi, Sri Balaji District (erstwhile Chittoor District) and furtherdirect the 2nd respondent to initiate action against the respondent No.3 for misusing his official powers for settlements of civil dispute and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: < ... to issue any Writ, Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in indulging in settlement of civil dispute in respect of petitioner's property is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and to consequently, direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere with the petitioner's right in any manner over the land admeasuring Ac.4.20 cents in Sy No.723/2 Surappakasam, Renugunta Mandal, Tirupathi, Sri Balaji District (erstwhile Chittoor District) and further direct the 2nd respondent to initiate action against the respondent No.3 for misusing his official powers for settlements of civil dispute and to pass ...= Heard Sri V.V.Satish, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court on 21.09.2022 in IA No.1 of 2022, respondent Police did not interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and unofficial respondent in respect of the subject property and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 30736 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*