Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24452 (AP)

Polur Rajani v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal

WP/2814/2014 · 2026-03-30

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010498942014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2814/2014 Between: 1.POLUR RAJANI,, W/O. LATE DR.Y.DAYANAND, AGED 38 YEARS, LECTURE IN ENGLISH, D.R.W.COLLEGE, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2.THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3.THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4.THE CORRESPONDENT, DUVVURU RAMANAMMA WOMEN'S COLLEGE, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524101. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not absorbing the services of the petitioner as Lecturer in English in the 4th respondent-College, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently the respondents be directed to absorb the petitioner in the vacancy of Lecturer in English in the 4th respondent - College, with consequential benefits, on par with similarly situated persons, including arrears of the salary, forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 3454 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption in the vacancy of Lecturer in English in the 4th respondent - College, forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S V MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2814 of 2014 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 31.03.2026 KGM 3 83 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2814 of 2014 Dated 31.03.2026 KGM