APHC010502152013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 29975/2013 Between: 1. V. SREELATHA, CHITTOOR DIST, W/O. S. JAYAPRAKASH, 35 YEARS D. NO. 8- 52, RANGANAYAKA STREET, CHITTOOR TOWN & MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL DIST JUDGE CHITTOOR DIST 2 OT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR 2. THE HIGH COURT OF AP REP BY ITS REGISTRAR RECRUITMENT, HYDERABAD 3. GOVERNENT OF AP REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GAD, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents in sending the Hall ticket to the petitioner permitting her to participate in the selection process initiated by notification No1/2013 dtd 20-7-2013 for the post of junior Assistant filed assistant, as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to process the application form submitted by the petitioner for the post of Junior Assistant and field assistant and field assistant 2 advertised in notification issued No1/2013 issued on 20-7-2013 to consider her candidature for the said post after declaring that the petitioner is eligible for the said post in view of the clause IV in the notification and the GO Ms No 518 dtd 29-6-2013 issued by Respondent No 3 and give her appointment as Junior Assistant or as filed assistant in the unit of respondent No 1 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37211 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent Not to issue call letters, hall tickets etc., so that the petitioner can participate in the selection process of written examination, interview etc., for the posts of Junior Assistant and field assistant advertised in notification issued No 1/2013 issued on 20-7-2013 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JITENDRA KANYALUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 2. N V SUMANTH 3 The Court made the following Order: There is no representation for the petitioner on 19.01.2026 and 02.02.2026 and the matter has been posted ‘for dismissal’ today. Today when the matter was called up, time is again sought on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecuting the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall no order as to costs. s As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 16.02.2026 BSM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P. No.29975 of 2013 16-02-2026 BSM