- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18798-DB WP No. 9773 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 9773 OF 2026 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: 1. SMT GATYATHRI BAI D/O. LATE PARASHURAMA SINGH W/O. M. SUNIL KUMAR SINGH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO.90, 6TH CROSS, KRISHNANAGAR, CHIKKADEVASANDRA, K.R. PURAM, BANGALORE 560036 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHAKUNTHALA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI KOVI DANODARA NAIDU S/O. KOVICHINNABBA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RETIRED MILITARY SERVICE PERSON R/AT NO.437, NSP ELECTRONIC FACTORY ROAD, AVALAHALLI, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560049. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BEING AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER DATED 31/01/2026 BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18798-DB WP No. 9773 of 2026 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALORE IN SC/29/E.A.71/2025 (ANNEXURE-A) IN VIOLATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND EQUITY AS ENSHRINED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THE PETITIONER IS NOT AWARE OF THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST HER AND DESPITE OF MENTIONING A WRONG ADDRESS AND FALSE SERVICES SHOWED, ORDERS AND WARRANTS BEING ISSUED AGAINST THE INNOCENT PETITIONER. HENCE, IT IS ILLEGAL AND NEEDS TO BE QUASHED/SET ASIDE, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 31.01.2026 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru in E.A.No.SC/29/EA/71/2025. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was not issued proper notice by the State Commission in C.C.No.92/2023 and without satisfaction of service of notice, the State Commission had passed the order dated 12.08.2024 directing to refund a sum of Rs.60,00,000/- paid by the complainant with interest at the rate of 9% per - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18798-DB WP No. 9773 of 2026 annum from the date of undertaking to refund the payment i.e., 18.02.2021, till the date of actual realization. Besides the compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- the cost of litigation of Rs.20,000/- was imposed. 3. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is a complete code. The competent forums and the statutory remedies are provided within the Act itself for filing the complaint/appeal/revision. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent forum against the order passed by the State Commission, if so advised. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4