Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:41381
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.3331 of 2019
Decided on: 25.09.2026 __________________________________________________________
Vijay Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioner-Vijay Kumar has come up before this Court, seeking the following reliefs:-
“17 (a) That respondent may kindly be
directed to include the name of petitioner in the seniority list of Lecturers School cadre at appropriate place with regularly appointed lectures.
(b) That respondents may kindly further be directed to consider the case of petitioner for consequential benefits like promotion or inclusion the name of petitioner in panel prepared for promotion to the post of principles.
(c) That respondent may kindly be
directed to give fresh seniority number to petitioner with regular appointed lecturers and before lecturers appointed on tenure basis
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:41381
and seniority given as per letter dated October, 2010 Annexure P-3) may kindly be quashed and set aside.”
2.
Upon issuance of notice on 12.11.2014, pleadings were exchanged inter-se the parties to present lis.
3.
At this stage, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on Instructions, states that, due to subsequent events, petitioner does not intend to pursue with the present proceedings [Statement Taken on Record].
4.
The prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by State Counsel also.
5.
Based on the aforesaid statement, the instant proceedings are closed.
6.
In these circumstances, the instant petition stands disposed of alongwith all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge September 25, 2026
[Bhardwaj]