Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24445 (PNJ)

SEEMA PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6596/2026 · 2026-06-19

Deepak Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 121 CRWP-6596-2026 Date of Decision:19.06.2026 Seema Pandey and Another …..Pe..oners Vs. State of Punjab and Others .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Naveen Mahajan, Advocate for the peoners. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of this peon filed under Arcle 226/227 of Constuon of India, peoners prays for issuance of the appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus for direcng respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect life and liberty for the threats caused by respondent Nos.4 and 5. It is submi-ed by learned counsel that peoner No.1 was employed with New Image Immigraon, being managed and controlled by respondent Nos.4 and 5. During the course of employment, peoners came to know about certain alleged illegal immigraon acvies being carried out by respondent Nos.4 and 5 including use of fake visas, forged documents and misleading clients. It was further alleged that respondent Nos.4 and 5 used the bank accounts of the employees including peoner No.2 for transfer of clients funds. Subsequently FIR No.0096 dated 04.08.2024 was also registered against respondent Nos.4 and 5 at Police Staon Sadar, Sangrur. Peoners also submi-ed a NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.19 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6596-2026 -2- complaint before the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar. Upon submi:ng the same, peoners are being threatened by respondent Nos.4 and 5 to implicate them in false cases. Peoner also made a representaon to Staon House Officer, Police Staon Baradari, Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) and to the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar, but no acon has been taken so far. Noce of moon. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab accepts noce on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3- State. Having noced the contenons made by learned counsel for the peoners, respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar Commissionerate, Jalandhar is hereby directed to look into the representaon made by the peoners. He is further directed to assess the threat percepon to the life and liberty of the peoners and provide them necessary protecon, in case there is any need for the same. Disposed of. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE June 19, 2026 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.19 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document