WP No. 7959 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 7959 of 2026 1. S.Thirumoorthy, S/o.Sundaram, No.11/1,Kamaraj Salai, Karamadai-641 104, Coimbatore District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Legal Advisor/The Secretary, The Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Ombudsman, No.100,Anna Salai,Guindy, Chennai-600 032 2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, O/o.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, No.75,Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai 600 028 3.The Commissioner, Mettupalayam Municipality, Mettupalayam,Coimbatore District. 4.Kaveri Lodge, Rep by its Proprietor, Mr.Jawahar Viswanathan, D.No.3B,3E,Ward No.17, Ooty Main Road,Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 3rd respondent to implement the order passed by the 1st respondent in order No.84/Na/2025,dated 30.05.2025 within time frame to be https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7959 of 2026 fixed by this court WP No. 7959 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Kumarasamy For Respondent(s): DR.T.Seenivasan,SGP For R2 and R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to implement the order passed by the first respondent dated 30.05.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the fourth respondent, in violation of the planning sanction, has constructed the building, where a lodge is being run. By an order dated 30.05.2025, the first respondent has directed the third respondent to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent for violating the planning sanction. 3. Dr. T. Sreenivasan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3. On instructions, he would submit that the third respondent has already initiated action against the fourth respondent for violation of the building sanction by issuing a stop work notice and he would also submit that pursuant to the same, further action will also be taken against the fourth respondent. 4. The written instructions received by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 2 and 3 has also been placed on record before this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7959 of 2026 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is now satisfied since the stop work notice has been issued by the third respondent with regard to the building violation committed by the fourth respondent. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, after recording the fact that the third respondent has initiated action against the fourth respondent for the building plan violation by issuing a stop work notice to the fourth respondent and by undertaking to proceed further against the fourth respondent if further violations are committed by the fourth respondent in accordance with law. No Costs. 09-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7959 of 2026 WP No. 7959 of 2026 To 1.The Legal Advisor/The Secretary, The Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Ombudsman, No.100,Anna Salai,Guindy, Chennai-600 032 2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, O/o.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, No.75,Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai 600 028 3.The Commissioner, Mettupalayam Municipality, Mettupalayam,Coimbatore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7959 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 7959 of 2026 09-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis