IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10034 of 2026 ====================================================== Vashishtha Narayan Ray Son of Rameshwar Ray, Resident of Village- Ward No- 03 Jitwarpur Chauth, P.S.- Samastipur (M), Distt- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the District Collector Samastipur. 2. The Collector, Samastipur. 3. The Additional Collector, Samastipur. 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Samastipur. 5. The Circle Officer, Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Standing Counsel (16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 14-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for issuance of writ in nature of Mandamus directing to Respondents No.5 i.e. Circle officer Samastipur to comply the instruction of the Respondents No.3 i.e. Additional Collector, Samastipur as contained in Letter No.2759 dated 12.07.2022 issued in terms of Letter No.949 dated 01.07.2022 of Respondents No.4 i.e. D.C.L.R Samastipur, and directed the Circle Patna High Court CWJC No.10034 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026 2/3 officer Samastipur to correct the subsequent Jamabandi no.19 related to khata no.9, plot no. 16 of maujakharaj 61, Halka-Hakimabad, Thana no.205 in which mischievously and deliberately wrong entry was made in the name of unauthorized and non-entitled person. For further be pleased to issue any other writ or writs, order/orders, Direction/Directions, command/Commands or any other relief/reliefs for which the Petitioner is legally entitled. During Pendency of this writ Petition, the further action by the concern Circle Officer in the instant issue may be restrained.” 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the respondent no.3, the Additional Collector, Samastipur for the redressal of the grievance as it is clear that the Circle Officer, Samastipur has not taken note of direction issued earlier. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the respondent no.3, the Patna High Court CWJC No.10034 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026 3/3 Additional Collector, Samastipur who shall be taking up the matter and after noticing/hearing all the necessary parties pass an appropriate order in accordance with law at an earliest, preferably within a period of three months. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U