1 APHC010496802016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16896/2016 Between: 1. AKULA RAJABABU, S/O SWAMY, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR (A GRADE) R/O D NO. 70-3-19,RTC COLONY, RAMANAYAPET,KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BOGULAKUNTA, ABIDS, HYDERABAD, 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI DURGAMALLESWARASWAMY VARI TEMPLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 4. ADITYA ELECTRICALS, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR P SUDHA RANI W/O P NAGARAJ MADHURA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. GARIMELLA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O SUBBA RAO, D NO.26-13-55, SRINIVASULDRAJU STREET, GANDHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the 2 nature of Writ of Mandamus, questioning declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in confirming the tender in favor of the 4th respondent even though the 4th respondent is not qualified as per the tender notification vide Notice No.22/ENG/2016 dated 15.03.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent issued by the respondent is illegal arbitrary and violation of of principles of natural justice and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and the same is to set aside notification by canceling the same IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 20798 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in the tender notification vide Notice No.22/ENG/2016 dated 15.03.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent here in pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M K RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16896/2016 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed that the present writ petition is filed challenging the tender notification issued in the year 2016. Therefore, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 06.02.2026 BSP 4 13 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16896/2016 06.02.2026 BSP