Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24433 (AP)

K.Sukanya v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23246/2018 · 2026-02-11

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010493602018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23246/2018 Between: 1. K.SUKANYA,, D/O. V. NARAYANA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. MG COLONY, ANANTHAPUR TOWN, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in not paying any compensation in lieu of acquisition of the land of the petitioner for house site without paying any compensation or alternative land in respect of Sy.No.222/1B an extent of Ac. 0.40 cents situated at Kakkalapalli Village, Ananthapur Rural Mandal, Ananthapuramu District on the representation of the petitioner Dt. 25.06.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and violation 2 JS, J W.P.No.23246/2018 of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to pay compensation including allotment of alternative land to the petitioner in lieu of acquisition of the land in Sy.No.222/1B an extent. of Ac. 0.40 cents situated at Kakkalapalli Village, Ananthapur Rural Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to pay compensation including allotment of alternative land to the petitioner in lieu of acquisition of the land in Sy.No.222/1B an extent of Ac. 0.40 cents situated at Kakkalapalli Village, Ananthapur Rural Mandal, Ananthapuramu District,pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.23246/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 12.02.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.23246/2018 10 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23246/2018 Date: 12.02.2026 rsd