Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24427 (AP)

MUNAGALA JYOTHI v. MUNAGALA MALA KONDAREDDY

CRLRC/1123/2024 · 2026-02-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010490002024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1123/2024 Between: MUNAGALA JYOTHI, W/O MUNAGALA MALAKONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, HINDU R/O. FLAT NO C. 3RD FLOOR, SRINIVASA RESIDENCY', SARASWATHI NAGAR, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. PRESENTLY R/O D.NO. 26-14-193 FLAT NO. 201, B.V. NAGAR, NEAR SANGAMITRA SCHOOL, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. MUNAGALA MALA KONDAREDDY, S/O CHINNA KONDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. SHIVAJI NAGAR, CHENCHU LAKSHIMIPURAM, BAGOLU BITRAGUNTA , SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ROSEDAR S.R.A Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: The instant Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C against the Order dated 03.06.2024 passed in I.A.No.873 of 2022 in M.C.No.98 of 2022 on the file of Judge, Family Court – cum- VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore. 2. Heard Sri S.R.A.Rosedar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Siva Prasad Reddy Venati, learned counsel for Respondent No.1. Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 2 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of by giving a direction to the trial Court for speedy disposal of the matter. 4. Learned counsel for Respondent No.1 also submits that the Court may pass appropriate orders and they will cooperate for the quick disposal of the matter. 5. As can be seen from the record, the maintenance has been filed before the trial Court in the year 2022 and the same is still pending. It is represented that the matter is coming up for cross examination of P.W.1. It is also represented that Respondent No.1 / Husband has not been attending the Court and that is why the matter has been adjourning from time to time. 6. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. However, the learned trial Judge is directed to dispose of M.C.No.98 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible, without granting any adjournments in a casual way by mere asking and communicate the progress of the matter to the Registrar (Judicial) by 01.04.2026. Both parties are directed to cooperate for the disposal of the matter. Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.02.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.R.C.No.1123 of 2024 Dt.17.02.2026 Dinesh