Sk. Mahaboob Subhani s/o Md. Khasim v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its
WP/12621/2013 · 2026-02-04
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24426 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24426 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010492922013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12621/2013 Between:
1. SK. MAHABOOB SUBHANI S/O MD. KHASIM,, OCC: NODAL PRERAK, R/O KURICHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETAIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE, -
3. THE DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION A P HYDERABAD, -
4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR ADULT EDUCATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KURICHEDU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6. MUKTHIPUDI PEDDA MANGA RAJU S/O DEVASAHAYAM, R/O WEST KASIPURAM VILLAGE KURICHEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly
2
one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned order passed by the 5th respondent bearing Rc.No. A/18/2010 dt. 12-7-2012 rejecting the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Mandal Coordinator of Kurichedu Mandal, as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the guidelines issued by the Government, and consequently set aside the same, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 15554 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent authorities to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Mandal Co-ordinator of Kurichedu Mandal, by suspending the impugned order passed by the 5th respondent bearing Rc.NO. A/18/2010 dt. 12-7-2012, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K ARUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION
2. G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP ZPP) The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
1. The petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner for the post of Mandal Co-ordinator of Kurichedu Village & Mandal, Prakasam District. The 5th respondent had rejected the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Mandal Co-ordinator.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State submits that the State has taken a policy decision to discontinue the Mandal Co-ordinator was with effect from 31.03.2018.
3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
05.02.2026 RMD
4
215
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 12621/2013
05.02.2026 RMD