Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24425 (HP)

BARFI DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/15353/2026 · 2026-09-25

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15353/2026 Decided on: 25.09.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Barfi Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Following order was passed in this petition on 03.09.2026: - “Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajesh Kosh, learned counsel appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 & 5 and 4, respectively. Petitioner's grievance is that even though Pension Payment Order has been issued in her favor pursuant to the judgment rendered on 23.3.2023 in CWP No. 3970 of 2020 holding her entitled to pension with effect from 01.01.2018, yet admissible arrears of pension, in terms of the PPO, have not been released to her. If that is so, let the respondents release the due and admissible arrears of pension to the petitioner within a period of two weeks and furnish the compliance. This shall be subject to 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 cost of ₹2,500/- in case the respondents have not implemented their own PPO till date. List on 25.09.2026.” Pursuant to above, learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 10.09.2026 from District Treasury Officer, Mandi, in terms thereof, admissible arrears to the petitioner have been released on 14.08.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the above fact. 3. In view of above, this petition to stand disposed of as grievance of the petitioner raised herein stands redressed. At the persuasive request made by learned Additional Advocate General, cost in terms of the order dated 03.09.2026 is waived off. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 25th September, 2026 rohit