SANTOSH SAW @ SANOSH SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4868/2026 · 2026-08-28
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24424 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24424 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:25895 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 4868 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4868 of 2026
1. Santosh Saw @ Sanosh Saw, age 29 years, Uday Saw
2. Rahul Kumar, age 28 years, S/o Uday Saw
3. Rohit Saw @ Rohit Sao, age 24 years, S/o Uday Saw
All are residents of Vill.- Minus Colony, Bachra, P.O. Bachra, P.S. Piparwar, Dist.- Chatra, State- Jharkhand, Mob.-9939031294
… Petitioners
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate
Mr. Atulaya Shresth, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P.
-----
04/28.08.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case No.23/2026, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of the learned JMFC cum Civil Judge, Sr. Division-V, Chatra.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and informant, both are earning their livelihood by way of establishing temporary stall and they are selling juice and due to business rivalry, altercation took place between both the sides. He next submits that there are case and counter case and both the sides have received injuries. He also submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 6(V) of this application.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations of assault are there against the petitioners and in view of that, their prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.
( 2026:JHHC:25895 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 4868 of 2026
5. Considering that there are case and counter case between the parties and due to business rivalry the altercation took place and both the sides have received injuries and the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC cum Civil Judge, Sr. Division-V, Chatra in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case No.23/2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 28th August, 2026 Ajay/