1 / 2 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2595 of 2026 Sakhin Bai Nirmalkar W/o Shankar Nirmalka Aged About 64 Years R/o Makan No 131 Ward No. 03 Bhatapara, Gaon- Parsada-K (Panchayat-Parsada), Motimpur Khurd, Po Kharora District Raipur Chhattisgarh- 493225 ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mantraiaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Sub Divisional Department Water Management Division No. 2, Baloda Bazar, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - The Executive Engineer Water Resources Division No. 02, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 4 - The Dvisional Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Yatika Verma, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Sakshi Bajpai, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 20/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees, is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 2 / 2 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioner therein have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. Taking into consideration, the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh representations. In the event, petitioner submits representation, their claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Saurabh JUDGE