APHC010494892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2397 OF 2025 Between: 1. YELAKAPALLI CHENGALRAYAPPA, , S/O. Y.VENKATAPPA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. YELAKAPAILE SUBRAMANYAM,, S/O. Y.VENKATRMAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLEMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. DHANASI VENKATAMUNI,, S/O. LATE D. GURAPPA, AGED 72 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. DHANASI KRISHNAPPA,, S/O. LATE D. GURAPPA, AGED 67 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLEMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. AMURI SREENIVASULU, S/O.LATE A.VENKATRAMANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. AMURI RAVI, S/O.LATE A.VENKATRAMANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. AMURI MOHANAKUMARI, S/O.LATE A.SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. AMURI KRISHNAPPA, , S/O. A.LAKSHMANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. AMURI NAGAIAH, S/O. A.LAKSHMANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. AMURI KUMARAMMA, S/O. A.NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. AMURI RAMAIAH, S/O. A.LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GOSALAKURAPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHOWEDEPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S V MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AYESHA AZMA S The Court made the following ORDER: At the time of considering the matter, Mr.S.V.Muni Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, stated that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. NINALA JAYASURYA,J Date:27.02.2026 Ssv THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2397 OF 2025 Date:27.02.2026 Ssv