APHC010488922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2611 OF 2025 Between: 1. SAI BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONS NELLORE, rep. by its Managing Director, M. Sathish Reddy, S/o. M. Lakshminarayana Reddy, Aged about 53 years, Occ Contractor, R/o. Flat No. 401 AND 402, Sai Balaji Castle, Tekkemitta, Nellore Town AND District. ...Petitioner AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. 2. Sri Peeyush Kumar, Principal Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. 3. Sri B Prema Kumari, The Director of works and Account Officer, Anjaneya Towers, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District. 4. Sri O Anand I A S, The District Collector AND District Magistrate, (MA AND UD) SPSR Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 5. Sri O Nandan, The Commissioners Director of Municipal Administration, Sri Krishna Enclave, Gorantla, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 6. Sri Aligiri Seshagiri Rao, The Executive Engineer, SPSR Nellore Municipal Corporation, SPSR Nellore District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 4515/2025 dated 02.04.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) Counsel for the Respondents:SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondents:T LAKSHMI PADMAJA The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Contempt Case No.2611 of 2025 O R DE R: When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents, that the orders of this Court in W.P. No. 4515 of 2025, dated 02.04.2025, were complied with and no further orders are required in the Contempt Case. 2. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this case shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 11.03.2026 eha 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.C.No.2611/2025 Dt. 11.03.2026 eha