1 2026:CGHC:6798 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5830 of 2023 Motilal Sharma S/o. Shri Mahavir Prasad Sharma, Aged About 64 Years R/o. Ashok Vihar Colony Phase -2, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Homes, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Sector -19, Block 03, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur, Near Collectorate Building Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Janjgir-Champa, District - Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Division Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents WPS No. 5833 of 2023 Varun Lal Sahu S/o Shri Mukhiram Sahu, Aged About 63 Years R/o Q. No. 48, Kalika Nagar, Tifra, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner Versus YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.02.06 17:51:53 +0530 2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Homes, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Sector 19, Block 03, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Gorela Pendra Marvahi District Gorela Pendra Marvahi Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None For State : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Deputy Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 06.02.2026 1. Today, when the cases were called for hearing, despite repeated calls, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners did not appear and no representation was made on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petitions. There was also no request made for adjournment or any explanation offered for such non-appearance. In the aforesaid circumstances, it appears that the petitioners are no longer interested in prosecuting the present matters. 2. Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State, is present and ready to assist the Court. 3 3. Considering the continuous non-appearance on behalf of the petitioners and the apparent lack of interest in pursuing the writ petitions, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present writ petitions for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, both the writ petitions stand dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh