APHC010495102003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 21467/2003 Between: 1.K.NARAYANA REDDY., S/O.PAPI REDDY, CLERK - CUM - CASHIAR RAYALASEEMA GRAMEENA BANK, SAMBEPALLE BRANCH, CUDDAPAH DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1.CHAIRMAN RAYALASEEMA BANK CUDDAPAH ANOTHER, REP.BY CHAIRMAN, CUDDAPAH. 2.GENERAL MANAGER, RAYALASEEMA GRAMEENA BANK, CUDDAPAH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of certiorari calling for the proceedings leading upto and including the Proceedings of the Appellate Authority i.e. the Respondent No.1 herein dated 24-4-2003 conveyed in Proceedings No.1713/A/0397/STF/2003 dated 6-5- 2003 of the second respondent and by nullifying the same direct release of the withheld increments while also directing the respondent to treat the suspension period from 27-11-2001 to 2-9-2002 as period spent on duty together with all consequential and attendant benefits IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 26797 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for final hearing of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 101972 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.V UMA DEVI 2.. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION No.21467 of 2003 ORDER: On earlier occasion, it was informed that the respondent No.1/Bank no more exists and the said Bank has merged with Chaitanya Grameena Bank and eventually re-named as Andhra Pradesh Grameena Bank. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought time on 18.09.2025, 22.11.2025 and 18.12.2025, for taking steps to amend the name of 1st Respondent/Bank by filing appropriate application. 3. Again today, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks further time. This Court is not inclined to grant any further time. It appears that the petitioner is not willing to prosecute the present writ petition. 4. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANAJAN Date: 22.01.2026 CVD